I lost out on a book prize today—one I really, really
wanted, from a press I admire, and which came with an optional residency in Italy.
For the past two months, I've been in the running—first making the long list,
then, just before Christmas, being notified that my manuscript had made it to
the finals, along with five other manuscripts. One in six. That's not bad odds
in the poetry book world, not bad odds at all. At Cider Press Review, it's not unusual for us to get 500 or more
manuscripts submitted for a book award, if that gives you any inkling of what
one-in-six means for a manuscript. I have no idea how many manuscripts were
under consideration for this one book prize, but I doubt it was fewer than 300
or more than 1,000. Mine made it to the top six before the judges chose a book
by someone else.
And I'm surprised by just how okay I am with the whole
thing. I tend to be pretty relaxed about sending out work, basically blasé about
getting rejection slips (or, as one writer I know calls them, letters of decline), almost as blasé about
getting acceptances—although I'll be the first to admit that the latter feels
much better than the former. The point is that my mood doesn't rise or fall
based on what any given editor or reader thinks of my work.
In part, this attitude comes from my work at Cider Press Review. I know, from being
on the receiving end of all those manuscripts (never mind the individual poems—I
hesitate to even count those, but if you'd like an indication of what that
entails, our submission period has been open for just under three weeks as I
write this, and we've received almost 260 submissions—most of which contain three
to five poems, so go ahead and do the math about what we're facing over the
course of the next few months)…where was I? Ah, yes. I know, from being on the
receiving end of all those manuscripts, that there are all sorts of aspects of
awarding a poetry book prize that are way beyond the poet's control. I know
what it feels like to fight for a manuscript and lose, what it feels like to
fight for a manuscript and win (again, I prefer the latter), what it's like to
think you know which manuscript an outside judge will choose only to be proven
wrong. I know what it's like to make the phone call to tell a poet that his or
her manuscript will soon be a book, and what it's like to write an email—like the
one I got this morning—saying, in essence, how disappointed I am that a
manuscript will not be a book, at
least not this time around.
That knowledge makes not winning (I truly hesitate to use
the word "losing" in this context—it's one thing to say I lost out on
a prize, another entirely to simply say that I lost) easier. The email makes it
even more so. At the same time, this manuscript is important to me, in ways
that I haven't really figured out how to express. I've said before that it was
important to me to do right by the poems I've included there, and I believe
I've done so. And it's one thing for my poet friends to say they agree with me—no
matter how much I admire them (and I do), they're still, after all, my friends—but
it's another to have my work reach people I don't know with such power that
they not only fight for it, but write me a note to let me know they were
fighting for it.
I can't tell you how much easier it is to not have to wait
anymore. Not winning is way easier than maybe winning.
I am not a fan of waiting. I never have been. It's not that
I'm impatient, necessarily—poetry can't be rushed, not the composition and
certainly not the revision. Teaching can't be rushed. Patience is a runner's
friend: after nursing a sore knee over the summer and much of the fall, I want
to get back to running 30-mile weeks. I want to get my long run up to 15 miles,
just to prove to myself I can and to keep things interesting. I want to
continue to get faster, too. But if I rush increasing my mileage, I'll get
hurt. If I rush increasing my speed, I'll get hurt. So I need to be patient,
and running is really good practice. I'm patient with students, with reading,
with walking my mother-in-law—over the phone, no less—through adding a second
email account to her Gmail, with any number of things. I'm not generally
patient with myself, but I'm working on it. [Insert joke about how it's not going
as quickly as I'd like here.]
Here's the thing I'm learning about patience: it's hard
sometimes, sure, but it's much easier when I feel like I have some kind of control over things. In
general, I like to take action. I like to move. If I want a new job (I don't!),
I'll go find one. If I want a poem to appear in a specific journal, I'll send
them work—again and again if I have to. I will, if something is important
enough to me in the moment, drop everything else and focus my attention on
doing everything I can to accomplish that goal. In general, I would rather be doing something; it doesn't always
matter what it is.
With book prizes—with any publication, really—there isn't
anything to be done. I've put together a manuscript I'm really proud of. The
poems are strong, they do what they're supposed to be doing, and I've put them
together in a satisfying order. I sent it out to some carefully-selected
publishers. One of them announced a winner and gave no indication of finalists;
one of them announced a winner and finalists and I wasn't on the list; an
editor at a third sent me that really nice rejection letter of decline this morning. A handful of
others won't respond for a few months, most likely. That's the way it goes. I
send it out and I wait.
The relief of today's no
comes in it being time for me to do
something again. Time to look up a couple of publishers, see where my work
will fit best, send the manuscript out again. Time to look up a couple of more
publishers for February (I try to send to two each month, but it's not a
hard-and-fast rule). And yes, it's nice to get kind words from the handful of
people I told about this particular book prize, nice to feel supported and
loved and strong. Mostly, though, it's nice to take action.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.